Does the Before Influence the After? Career Paths, Nominations, and Votes of the STF Justices

Do previous trajectories of Federal Supreme Court justices influence their votes in court? Despite recent advances research on judicial behavior, questions remain about the factors influencing decisions STF justices. Building a new typology these justices' career paths, this article tests hypothesis that professional characteristics influenced behavior judging Ação Penal 470, criminal case known as Mensalão . Our theory suggests nominees bring to court law interpretations and worldviews were not only developed activities but also affected by conditions stability or political dependence marked paths. Legal expertise means rise, types interests used defending before joining shape decision-making STF. Based logistical regressions, we conclude convict acquit AP 470 trial are associated with characteristics. findings carry implications for theories process appointing